Open Letter to respected Academics at University of Sydney about Tim Anderson's sacking

Dear Esteemed University of Sydney Academics,

I am writing to you in reference to your support letter for Dr Tim Anderson.

In principle, your stand is quite admirable and this is what one would expect from academics rising to the occasion of supporting a colleague who is a victim of suppression of free speech and Palestinian rights.

However, as an Australian of Palestinian origin, I have during a lengthy period been the person organising or co-organising all pro-Palestine activities in Australia, and I assure you from a position of knowledge that Dr Anderson has never been an advocate for Palestinian rights. Furthermore, his recent online social media activities have proven beyond reasonable doubt that he is not an advocate of free speech either.

Allow me to begin with the latter. Myself, among other Arab pro-Palestine and Syria activists and their family members, have been systemically attacked by Dr Anderson and a group of supporters that he selectively chooses to send us intimidatory material, including death threats. He is clever not to directly be involved in order to avoid legal complications in Australia, but he is clearly complicit and the examples are numerous and we can provide the evidence.

On one occasion, Dr Anderson thanked a thug who lives in America for advocating lynching us and even commented to this thug that he was “Too Kind”.

On another occasion, he publicly defended his colleague’s right to vilify a journalist based on his Armenian ancestry, asking the journalist if he wanted another Armenian genocide.

On other occasions he endorsed and supported rumours about myself and other colleagues of threatening to murder people.

He used his friends on Facebook to befriend our family members so he could spy on us and gain access to private information and family photos.

His gang of thugs intimidated our friends overseas and coerced them to disassociate from us on the social media and threatened them with photos of their grandchildren, telling them that they know where the child lives.

He made personal accusations against me, naming me and calling me an Israeli, Mossad spy; which in my community is quite defamatory and damaging.

Some of us for our essential safety had to use pseudonyms, especially for activists who happen to be Muslims who wanted to de-bunk the ISIS ideology. These activists had entrusted Dr Anderson with this very privileged information. But, Dr Anderson flagrantly and repeatedly outed their names, their photos and published untruths about them in a seemingly deliberate attempt to have them targeted by the terrorists.

There are many such stories and they can all be substantiated with clear and solid evidence which we can provide to you upon your request.

Ironically, the reasons for Dr Anderson’s outrage and backflip against those indigenous Levantine allies was simply because they disagreed with his alleged approach to defending Syria and because he wanted to be the man in charge of the social media based activity.

So, I ask you esteemed academics, how is it possible Dr Anderson alleges to be a victim of an anti-free speech campaign conducted by the University of Sydney, when he, in fact, has been spearheading a vicious, dangerous campaign against me, my family, against many other indigenous activists who are Palestinian, Syrian and including their family members just because we disagree with him.

We now go back to Dr Anderson’s alleged support of Palestine. As mentioned earlier, all the pro-Palestine functions that I have personally organised over many years, were done long before I heard of the name Tim Anderson. His name in his alleged role in supporting Palestine is only recent and cannot be substantiated with any evidence at all. As a matter of fact, all that many Palestinian and Arab activists have received from him has been nothing but intimidation and threats.

Finally, as a secular Palestinian, I along with other like-minded Arabs, endorse a secular, all-inclusive Palestine in which Muslims, Christians, Jews, members of other sects, even atheists, as well as ethnic minorities, can live peacefully, side by side, all valued, protected and equal before the law. Dr Anderson’s recent endorsement of a public photo of his colleague wearing a badge that curses Jews, does not serve the Palestinian cause. That same badge calls for victory for Islam; a call akin to that of ISIS. The irony here is that on one hand Dr Anderson uses anti-Nazi/Israeli materials in his classes, and then at other times, conveniently adopts Nazi-like anti-Semitic approaches.

The question we ask here is; where does Dr Anderson stand on this all? As a matter of fact, where does he stand on all other pertinent issues mentioned above?

Dr Anderson does not behave, speak or write like an academic should. He is not a living example of an advocate for free speech and he is surely not a friend of Palestine and Palestinians. The University of Sydney has never in the past, to my knowledge, dismissed an academic because of their support for Palestine. I am not aware of any such dismissal based on suppressing free speech either. Among others, I have reported Dr Anderson to the University, voicing our concerns and fears. We believe that the University has taken into account all of this in reaching their decision against Dr Anderson and, once again, for the last time, as far as I can see, with the evidence available to me, and from personal experience, I cannot see how this decision was based on restricting free speech.

If our personal safety and the safety of our families and children mean anything to you, at a time when it is difficult to press charges against anyone who is protected by the anonymity of Facebook and Twitter, then we ask of you to take this into account and withdraw your public support of Dr Anderson because he has been capitalising on this flaw, using those weak spots to target, intimidate, smear and endanger us, all the while being untouchable.

Thank you,

Jamal Daoud

President of Social Justice Network, human rights campaigner and community leader

Chris Morrison: We Need Actions Against Radical Islam; Not Divisive Rhetoric

As a prominent Muslim, a moderate and secular one, I agree with our MP Scott Morrison that radical Islam is one of the most dangerous threats to Australian society, and indeed to the whole world. But before Scott Morrison vends such rhetoric, he needs to come up with a lot of explanations as to why his government did not take actions against radical Islam and extreme Muslims in the last 5 years.

To the contrary: his government was in fact silent, if not by this silence complicit, with radical groups in many ways. It is the time for Scott Morrison to stop the tough sounding talk and poisonous rhetoric and start acting to address this serious issue.

I was the first to warn that radical Muslims are very active in Australia and constitute an extreme threat not only to Australia's national security, but also to our harmony and social cohesion. In fact I was the only Muslim to stand up against the extremists, despite their death threats to me and my kids, putting up with the many physical and verbal attacks. I put my life and the lives of my kids on the line. Surprisingly, and despite all of this, Scott Morrison's government and MPs were refusing to talk to me or listen to my warnings or making any attempt to cooperate with me and my community of secular and moderate Muslims.

Scott Morrison and his Liberal Party government (and State Liberal government) to date did not take a single serious action to counter the high level of radicalisation in the community. Not only this; at many stages they were coordinating with extremist organisations, including granting them millions of dollars in public funding in the name of “de-radicalisation programs”.

After years of repeated terrorist attacks and many aborted ones, we discover that Australian authorities did not close down a single centre of hate. They did not deport a single hate preacher and, they did not take any legal action against any “Imam of hate” in the suburbs.

I also can confirm that these extremist organisations that brainwashed and recruited extremists/terrorists like Hassan Khalif Shire Ali are still receiving funding from overseas and locally. What did authorities do to stop the funding? Practically very little. Extremist organisations are still active in fundraising and sending money to Al Qaeda in Idlib, and they do so publicly. Some of these funds are spent on local brainwashing and recruitment.

Scott Morrison also needs to publicly tell us what his government’s plans are to stop future similar terrorist attacks; unless he thinks that Hassan Khalif is the only extremist/terrorist in Australia. He needs to outline to Australians his government's de-radicalisation plans. But before he does this, he needs to publicly explain to Australians the assessment of the success of previous de-radicalisation plans that were put in place in the aftermath of the Lindt Cafe siege. He needs to explain the results and successes of these programs where hundreds of millions of dollars were spent.
The media should start asking the right and tough questions. The media currently asks the naive question of “where did all this radicalisation come from?” Instead, it should start asking questions about evaluating publicly funded projects aimed to fight against extremism that are actually funded and conducted by extremist organisations. The media should also start to ask why authorities prefer to deal with extremists, whilst ignoring moderate voices like mine.

Scott Morrison’s Liberal government (and that under Abbot and Turnbull) not only ignore and keep ignoring people like myself, but on many occasions harass me and even collude with foreign authorities trying to end my activities. The same has happened with other activists. 
I wish to reiterate here again that extremists and terrorists like Man Monis and Hassan Khalif are a minority among Muslims in this country. I agree that radical Muslims are very dangerous to Australia’s national security and, in fact, one of the anti-terrorism agents told me privately that they are “dangerous criminal gangs” that constitute a serious and imminent threat to every Australian. I agree that if not challenged, the danger could become a real nightmare, especially with the return of hundreds of trained terrorists who fought in Syria and Iraq. But what we need from our authorities, especially our federal government, is actual actions and not divisive rhetoric that is directed to constitute a base for an electoral comeback for the extremely unpopular Morrison government.

The first step for Morrison, if he is serious about fighting against this cancer (radical Islam), is to cooperate with anti-radical groups and individuals. He should start cooperating with us, not ignoring us. He needs to take serious actions to stamp out the source of radicalisation. In many countries, some actually Muslim countries, authorities closed hundreds of radical mosques and religious centres. They arrested preachers for spreading hate and encouraging violence and they cut funding and dried up any funding sources. This included enforcing Saudi embassy to stop funding local extremists.

And we as moderate Muslims are always open for any cooperation and coordination. So far, the Liberal government has refused to cooperate with us, and instead cooperates with extremist organisations. Our message to our PM is to stop talking tough on this issue and start taking real action. We as moderate Muslims will support such actions that are directed at stopping radicalisation but, we will never support rhetoric that aims to further divide our society.

Why I will Campaign Against Labor in the Next NSW State Election

Following the disgraceful demise of NSW Labor opposition leader Luke Foley, I received many enquiries from the media and community members asking about my position on the next state election.

As many know by now, I declared that I will campaign against NSW Labor candidates in the next election, for many reasons. We will campaign in a few seats to see Labor candidates lose or at least humiliated.

For years now, we are deeply shocked at Labor’s association with Muslim extremist groups, to the point of their sleeping in bed with them. Not only has Labor embarrassed itself at the last state election in 2015 by parachuting a close associate of several extremist organisations into the Lakemba seat, going against the local Labor members. Despite the latter’s embarrassing revelations about Jihad Dib’s confirmed role in turning Punchbowl Boy’s High School from a drug-dealer’s hub into an extremist’s hub, and the many embarrassing stories about Dib’s family members’ dark connections and actions, including allegations of his brother’s sexual assaults and domestic violence against his wife (https://thenewdaily.com.au/sport/boxing/2016/12/18/boxer-billy-dib-denies-wife-abuse-claims/). There’s also the matter of his father's close association with the Saudi embassy and support of the slaughtering of Yemeni citizens at the hands of Saudi aggression.(https://www.imlebanon.org/2016/03/12/saudi-arabia-australia-lebanon/)

Labor’s weak leadership by Luke Foley saw Mr Dib’s promotion to the shadow Ministry of Education.

When Luke Foley was parachuted into the seat of Auburn we thought that he would show strong leadership. From the beginning, he was very weak in the face of factions infighting and did nothing to bring unity and stability inside the party.

Even in dealing with the farce of Hicham Zreika's illegal activities to stack the branch with mainly Lebanese Muslim extremists in order to win preselction against Ms Barbara Berry, Mr Foley showed no leadership and settled for the compromise of freezing Hicham's membership in the local Labor branch for one year. Even after Hicham ran as an independent candidate against the local Labor candidates for the last Cumberland Council election, Mr Foley did not move to expel him from the party.

If the allegations of sexual abuse against Mr Foley prove to be true, we would be very concerned about this particular issue. Until now, we did not hear from the Labor member for Lakemba and shadow Minister for Education about any actions to condemn, or at least clarify, allegations of domestic violence committed by his brother Billy. The media widely covered the claims by Ms Sarah Shaweesh that Billy was extremely violent with her during their short marriage. She detailed that he received support from his father, Ali, and brother Jihad. There were many details in her public testimony that Jihad used his position as a politician to influence curbing any official police investigation into this matter. (Sarah's testimony is on https://www.facebook.com/shaweeshaa/posts/10209904731512471)

On another front, Mr Foley showed no leadership in dealing with other rogue Labor politicians, namely Shaoquett Moslemane. Mr Moslemane invited an academic with a deeply murky past to speak at an event organised by him at the State Parliament a few months ago.

This invitation to a member of terrorist organisation Ananda Marga, Tim Anderson, came despite the wave of community condemnation of his endorsement of deeply hateful comments towards the Australian Jewish population (https://honisoit.com/2018/08/usyd-lecturer-under-investigation/ )

Despite his condemnation of the invitation of this academic with a murky past by his colleague Shaoquett Moslemane, Luke Foley took no steps to discipline the rogue and highly unpopular Labor politician.

During the next State election campaign in 2019, we will campaign against Labor candidates in many Labor-held seats especially Lakemba and Auburn. We have not yet decided how we will do this. We might run candidates. But, if not enough resources are available, we might only run campaigns around the topic of why voters should not vote for extremism and religious hate, domestic violence against women and that they should vote for strong leadership.

Who Destroyed Kevin Rudd's Government: My Role!!

For the last few years, I did not interfere heavily in local politics. Instead, I focused on the Syrian crisis and the resulting local impact of it in the form of local extremism/terrorism. This was the real reason why both parties undermined my strength and role to the point of waging attacks (directly or indirectly) on me in a bid to put an end to my influence.

Some people unaware of this reality might suspect that I am delusional or paranoid. They may even think that I am just a big mouth trying to give myself bigger weight than my real one. I can deal with such opinions with documentation. I will talk about my role in destroying Kevin Rudd's government.

During the 2007 Federal election I supported Labor. It was the first time after my arrival in Australia to back Labor. I was never to this day a Labor member. I was a Greens member until 2006, and not an ordinary member at that. At different times I was spokesperson for immigration, delegate to national and state delegate councils (party conferences to adopt or amend policies), convener of policy committees and other vital roles.

Immediately after the election of Rudd's government, I was shocked to come across the amount of disunity inside the Labor party and government. Months after its election, prominent members of Labor, including ministers, started to destabilise the Rudd government.

Early in 2008, I was contacted by Labor members working with former Labor prominent member and minister, Daryl Melhem, who told me horrific things about Rudd. I was told that Rudd is a dictator, he never listens, he treats the cabinet members with disrespect and never accepted any criticism to the point of being violent with anyone who opposes his views. I was urged by Melhem's close associates to start campaigning to destroy Rudd.

The biggest shock to me was when we campaigned to get Aminovs' family permanent residence in October 2008. After we embarrassed Rudd with our action inside the parliament during question time ( https://www.smh.com.au/national/man-brings-house-to-a-standstill-20081023-gdszyj.html ) and, immediately after the media reported the embarrassment, I received a phone call from an aide to former Labor heavy weight and Minister for Multiculturalism, Laurie Ferguson, who was in fact a Labor councillor on the Parramatta Council. The caller told me “good on you Jamal. Please continue to embarrass Rudd on this issue. One or two more direct actions and Aminovs' will get a visa”.

I was shocked to see that a Labor faction leader, one of his office workers and a Labor councillor want me to destroy the Labor government.

And this is what happened. I continued to destabilise Rudd's government until he was ousted. My anti-Labor activities were supported and encouraged by Labor ministers and heavy-weight faction leaders, mainly from the left faction. Again I want to reiterate that I was never a Labor party member. Neither was I was Liberal member. I acted against Kevin Rudd on principled reasons, and not for any personal gains. I was successful, and together with support mainly from Labor members of the Cabinet, we destroyed Rudd's career and ended his prime ministership.

There is no doubt in any analyst’s or politician’s mind that Kevin Rudd lost his job as PM mainly because of a single issue: asylum seekers, refugees and migration. And, I was the loudest and most prominent activist on this issue to the point that the then Minister for Immigration Chris Bowen sent his department spokesperson, Sandi Logan, to tell journalists outside Villawood detention centre that I ordered the detainees to destroy the detention centre in 2010. Of course I did not do this, though I knew about the disturbances 5 minutes before they happened.

I continued my activism after Rudd was ousted. I helped destroy Gillard's government too. Gillard was acting as if she were a Liberal PM, which made our efforts to destroy her government much easier. Labor voters still want some humanity in political system. Julia did not show any humanity when her government re-opened Nauru and introduced the Malaysian-solution, cut funding for tertiary education, attacked the rights of single mothers, and continued and expanded the Northern Territory intervention program.

In my efforts to destroy the Gillard government, I was encouraged by Labor members who had been supporters of deposed PM Kevin Rudd. I met several times with prominent Labor members, some of them were Labor candidates in 2007 and 2010 elections. These Rudd supporters even offered to help me to get some public funding for our Social Justice Network organisation, clearly as a reward for helping to undermine the Gillard government. One of these Labor members is a solicitor who has dealt with very public cases and who offered to represent refugees and asylum seekers in suing Gillard's government.

I am writing this to remind the coming Labor Shorten government that we are ready to destabilise it. From the early indications, I am sure that Shorten government's life will be shorter than Rudd's.

I declare here that we will campaign very hard to get rid of the Morrison government. It is very clear that Shorten will be our next PM. But I can tell you from now that his government will not last beyond 12 months.

When Labor resorts to ally with members of terrorist organisations, supporters of ISIS and Al-Qaida and politicians who have no respect within their communities, we can see how desperate they are to the point of taking very wrong paths; a clear indication that its grip on power will be short lived.

Media discusses the increasing influence of politicians like Shaoquett Moselmane and Jihad Dib. The former recently invited a member of a terrorist organisation Ananda Marga, failed academic, Tim Anderson, to attack several respected academics, writers, community leaders and activists. Mr Moslemane enjoys near zero respect among members of his South Lebanese community. When I ran as a candidate in the seat of Rockdale 2015, I was told by many members of that community that if I will direct preference votes to Labor I will not get their votes. In a separate article, I will discuss Mr Moselmane’s bad reputation he has in the area.

The other “rising star” of Labor is the notorious Jihad Dib; the politician that was parachuted to the Lakemba seat in 2015 against the will of local members, thanks to the Saudi embassy's donations to the Labor party through its proxies in the area. The son of a well-known extremist and close ally to every Saudi ambassador in Australia, Jihad Dib’s sole public achievement was to turn Punchbowl Boys from a drug-dealer’s hub into terrorist-supporter’s hub. I will also dedicate many articles in the immediate future and in the lead up to NSW State election to shedding light on this notorious politician and his shameful family’s connections and “values”.

With these Labor new, emerging heavy-weights, I can with ease assure you that any future Shorten or Foley governments will be very short lived.

I can assure you even right now, knives are already sharpened to politically “assassinate” Shorten. With all these indications, Shorten will be lucky to survive 12 months. He has no charisma, no bright ideas and no good track record of any achievements.

As I declared earlier that I will actively campaign to end the Morrison Liberal government, simultaneously, I declare here, that I will help undermine Shorten's government immediately following its election. And I am sure that Labor knows very well how efficient I am in doing so. Of course the expected bad performance of this coming government will help me and many other social justice supporters achieve our goal.

People have been asking me for the last few years: “we do not know who you support in Parliament; sometimes you support Labor, sometimes you support Liberals.”

Well, I was frank from the beginning: Labor, Liberals and Greens are different faces of the same coin. Our mission here is to minimise their destructive impact. We also have a mission to create a viable and just alternative. I will talk about this in detail in another article.

But for now, my message to Labor is clear: shape up or expect Rudd's fate.

هل الكل انتصر في موضوع المرسوم السوري رقم 16؟

حسب عضو مجلس الشعب السوري نبيل صالح فالكل انتصر, بالرغم من انه ادعى انه كان اكبر الابطال والمنتصرين في الضجة التي اثارها حول المرسوم 16 الخاص بعمل وزارة الاوقاف. هذه الضجة التي يبدو انه كان مخططا لها ان تكون القشة التي ستقسم ظهر الدولة السورية

فالدولة والتي اصبحت قاب قوسين او ادنى من تحقيق انتصار على اشرس ازمة واجهتها سورية خلال تاريخها الحديث, كان من الممكن ان تاخذها العاصفة التي اختلقها نبيل صالح الى نتائج لا يمكن التنبء بها. فبين ليلة وضحاها تطور النقاش حول مرسوم عادي جدا ولا يحمل اي ابعاد مهمة, الى دعوات للتظاهر بالكنزات الحمر ودعوات لشل حركة الدولة “منعا لاسلمتها وتسليمها للوهابيين”. بالرغم من ان المرسوم يحدد الوهابيين والاخوان المسلمين وبالاسم كاعداء للدولة وللاسلام وللانسانية

ولا نعرف كيف انتصر نبيل صالح, بالرغم من ان حملاته المسعورة ضد الدولة وضد المرسوم نفسه باءت بالفشل الذريع وعلى كل الصعد

فالدعوة الى العصيان المدني والتظاهر في الشارع باللون الاحمر فشلت فشلا ذريعا عندما لم يتجاوب احد مع هذه الدعوات في رسالة واضحة ان الشعب السوري قد وعى الدرس وانه لن ينجر الى فتنة جديدة. كما ان مطالبات نبيل صالح بالغاء المرسوم واستبداله بمرسوم يعلن لا دينية الدولة ويشرع قمع المتدينين ايضا لم يتحقق

جل ما تحقق على يد نبيل صالح وجوقته المشبوهة هو تغييرات طفيفة على المرسوم المشار اليه بالغاء فقرة السماح للاجنبي بالعمل في المجال الدعوي واستبدال بعض التسميات باخرى. فالفريق الشبابي الديني استبدل بفريق الائمة الشباب, وعمر الائمة الشباب ارتفع من 18 عام الى 22. فهل كانت هذه التعديلات الطفيفة تستدعي هذا التهييج الطائفي والحقن الديني وشتم الدولة والمطالبة باسقاط الحكومة والدعوة الى عصيان مدني احمر يذكرنا بكوارث جورج سورس الملونة حول العالم؟

وهنا لا بد ان نتسائل عن البطولة التي اجترحها نبيل صالح في هذا المجال؟ فهو ادعى ان بطولاته في شتم الدولة وتهييج الاقليات على اسس طائفية قد ادت الى تغيير 75% من المرسوم, وهذا لم يحصل

منذ اندلاع العاصفة والتي لم تكن لتاخذ هذه الحدة الطائفية وهذا البعد الاعلامي والشعبي لولا نفخ قوى خارجية باتت معروفة للجميع, لم يتحفنا نبيل صالح ورفاقه عن ماخذهم على المرسوم سوى كلاما عاما تحذيريا من “اسلمة الدولة” و”تحكيم نهج ابن تيمية في الدولة”. وحتى يومنا هذا لم يقل لنا نبيل صالح كيف كان المرسوم في صيغته الاصلية سيعمل على تدمير العلمانية في سورية. كما لم يخبرنا هذا العضو كيف عملت التعديلات الطفيفة التافهة على تجنب تدمير علمانية الدولة وكيف منعت تسليم مفاصل الدولة للقوى الوهابية (غير الموجودة اصلا في الحكومة ومؤسسات الدولة)؟

الشيء الوحيد الايجابي في هذه الهمروجة هي انها اثبتت ان جورج سورس وكل معادي لسورية ودولتها من اجهزة استخبارات غربية وعربية معادية اصبحت غير قادرة على احداث اي تغيير جذري في المجتمع السوري الذي اصبح اكثر مناعه من قبل. فالالاف الذين اندفعوا في بداية الازمة تحت مسميات المطالبة بالديمقراطية والحرية وتشارك السلطة متظاهرين ضد الدولة, احجموا هذه المرة عن الاندفاع وراء اكاذيب مشابهة من نفس المصدر. فالازمة كانت مريرة ومكلفة ولا يوجد شخص سوري عاقل مستعد للمشاركة فيها, بوعي او بدون

كما كشفت هذه الهمروجة/المؤامرة عن وجوه جديدة من المتامرين (بوعي او بدون وعي) لم تتكشف حقيقتهم خلال الازمة. وبعضهم يبدو انه كان خلايا نائمة لسورس والاجهزة الاستخباراتية المعادية كخطة بديلة عندما تفشل الخطة الاصيلة في اسقاط الدولة عن طريق الارهاب والتدخل الخارجي

انا شخصيا من مؤيدي الديمقراطية والشفافية والعلمانية ومدافع عن حق اي مواطن في النقد. ولكن هناك فرق بين نقد جاد مبني على حقائق ويسعى للاصلاح والتغيير الايجابي, وبين محاولات تهييج الناس لاحداث شرخ خطير بين الدولة وابنائها لاحداث تغيير جذري في بنية الدولة وعقيدة نظامها

مؤامرة جديدة تطوى على سورية بفضل يقظه الدولة ووعي شعبها

كيف تسللت خلايا تجسس اسرائيلية الى سورية: الصهيونية المعروفة جانيس كورتكامب مثالا

اضطرار وزير الاوقاف السوري للظهور امام التلفزيون السوري محاولا تهدئة المخاوف المتصاعدة من المرسوم الخاص بوزارته والذي اثار ضجة هائلة على وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي خصوصا الفيبسوك هو دليل اضافي على نوعية المرحلة القادمة وتعاظم دور المواطن في ابداء رايه بل وفرضه في الكثير من الاحيان. فمرسوم تنظيم وزارة الاوقاف جوبه بحملة شرسة من قبل قطاعات واسعه من الشعب السوري رافقه سخرية واستهزاء من تصرفات الكثيرين من مسؤولي الوزارة ودعوات للتحرك الشعبي وعلى كل المستويات بشكل كبير من مؤيدي الدولة وحاضنتها الشعبية. ولذلك كان لزاما على الدولة التحرك وتهدئة مخاوف الحاضنة الشعبية والتي حمت الدولة في اخطر مراحل الازمة

ما حدث بما يخص مرسوم وزارة الاوقاف يجب ان يتكرر وفي اكثر من قضية تشغل الراي العام السوري, وخصوصا من مؤيدي الدولة والقطاعات التي رفضت المؤامرة سواء بشكل ايجابي بالمشاركة بحماية الدولة او بشكل سلبي بعدم الانخراط بالمؤامرة. فوسائل التواصل الاجتماعي وخصوصا الفيسبوك اثبتت انها اداة فعالة في يد محبي الدولة ومؤيديها في وجه الممارسات الشاذة من بعض الفاسدين او المستفيدين من الازمة

ونحن بدورنا وكداعمين للدولة سنستخدم فضاء الفيسبوك لفضح المؤامرة الكبرى التي تحاك ضد سورية بعد فشل مؤامرة التمرد المسلح والذي بمعظمه كان ارهابي. هذه المؤامرة والتي تعتمد على الزج بعناصر استخبارات معادية الى سورية تحت مسميات صحفيين مستقلين او متضامنين دوليين وعملها لتجنيد سوريين في محاولة لتحقيق ما عجزت عن تحقيقه بالارهاب. وفي المقالات القادمة سنعرض ادلة على ذلك وبالاسماء, محاولين تعرية الخلايا التجسسية ومن يتستر عليها

في مقالي هذا ساعرض الوثائق التي حصلنا عليها عن احدى متزعمات الخلايا التجسسية والتي ما تزال قادرة على دخول سورية بتاشيرات وتقابل مسؤولين سوريين وتظهر على شاشات التلفزيون الوطنية. كما احب ان ابين انني قد زودت بعض المسؤولين السوريين بهذه الوثائق, وننتظر اتخاذ الاجراءات الضرورية لاغلاق هذا الخرق الامني الاستخباراتي الخطير

المدعوة جانيس كورتكامب تقدمت بطلب تاشيرة زيارة الى سورية عن طريق سفارة الجمهورية العربية السورية في مدينة الكويت في ابريل/نيسان 2016. وفي الطلب الذي قدمته ذكرت انها تعمل ولاكثر من 10 سنين في كنيسة الهولي سبيريت (الروح القدس) الانجيلية. وقد حصلنا على نسخة من هذا الطلب وهو مرفق في مقالنا

وببحث سريع على محرك الجوجل المتوفر للعامة, اكتشف رفاقنا غسان قاضي وزكي الصواف ان الكنيسة المذكورة هي كنيسة صهيونية متشددة. وفي الموقع الالكتروني للكنيسة تبين لنا ان الكنيسة تنظم زيارات تضامنية للكيان الصهيوني الغاصب

بل ان الكنيسة تنشر صور لمسؤوليها والمشاركين في هذه الزيارات التضامنية وهم يرقصون احتفالا بانتصار الكيان الاسرائيلي ضد الدول العربية من على ظهر دبابات سورية مدمرة خلال الحروب المتتالية التي شنها الكيان

الاكتشافات الخطيرة لم تقف عند هذا الحد. فعلى الموقع الالكتروني يظهر اسم جانيس كورتكامب (او جانيس فيرينج وهو اسمها بعد الزواج) في اكثر من منصب في الكنيسة. اذا ما ذكرته في طلبها للحصول على التاشيرة الى سورية بانها تعمل في الكنيسة هو حقيقة وليس ادعاء

كما ان جانيس ذكرت في نفس الطلب ان زعيمها الروحي في الكنيسة هو القس كلانسي نيكسون. وببحث مرة اخرى على الجوجل يمكنكم ان تستمعوا الى خطب هذا النيكسون النارية في دعم كيان الاحتلال الغاصب. وفي احدى خطبه يقرر انه لا يمكن لاي مسيحي مؤمن ان يدخل الجنة الا اذ احب كيان الاحتلال وعمل على حماية هذا الكيان ودعمه

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjO-_1NuMaY&t=3s 

وفي نفس الطلب المقدم للسفارة السورية في الكويت, تذكر الصهيونية جانيس انها متزوجة ومن مدة طويلة من سيد فيرينج. وعودة الى محرك الجوجل المتوفر للعامة يظهر لنا نشاطات مختلفة للمدعو فيرينج. ففي احدى المرات يظهر سيد في هاييتي من ضمن اعمال اغاثية تبشيرية تقوم بها كنيسته الصهيونية رافعين العلم الاسرائيلي

وفي احتفال اخر, يظهر سيد وهو يمارس طقوسا صهيونية برفقة حاخامات صهاينة رافعين العلم الاسرائيلي

اذا الوثائق التي لدينا عن صهيونية جانيس هي ليست وثائق مفبركة او فوتوشوب او اشاعات مغرضة, بل وثائق بخط يدها وبتوقيعها وقدمت الى السفارة السورية في الكويت باليد. وهي بحوزة وزارة الخارجية السورية عن طريق سفارتها في الكويت

وبعد دخول الجاسوسة الصهيونية الى سورية في حزيران 2016, هربت اموالا طائلة الى سورية ووزعتها على الخلايا التي تم تنظيمها اما في الولايات المتحدة من سوريين امريكيين قرروا العودة الى سورية في نفس العام.او من سوريين تم تنظيمهم من خلال وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي. ولدينا اكثر من شاهد عيان على ان الجاسوسة الصهيونية جانيس وزعت اموالا طائلة على شكل مظاريف ممتلئة بالدولارات الامريكية. وبعض شهود العيان مستعدون حتى يومنا هذا للادلاء بما شاهدوه

كما ان بعض الجواسيس المحليين ومنهم شهيد سيراديريان اعترف وفي اكثر من منشور على الفيسبوك بتلقيه اموال طائلة من جانيس ورفاقها الجواسيس ووجه رسالة شكر الى “اليهود” الذين يرعونه وعائلته

كما نشطت الجاسوسة الصهيونية على شبكات التواصل في محاولة تدمير شبكات الدفاع الحقيقية عن سورية بالاتصال بالناشطين وبث الاكاذيب بشأن الوطنيين من اجل تدمير هذه الشبكات الفعالة. فقد اتصلت جانيس معي في بداية عام 2016 وحرضتني على العائلة قاضي, وهي من الشخصيات الانشط والاكثر فعالية في الدفاع عن سورية ومنذ بداية الازمة. وفي تحريضها لي ادعت جانيس ان العائلة هي عائلة وهابية تدعم جبهة النصرة وتتخفى تحت ستار الدفاع عن سورية. مما اضطرني الى ان انشر تعليقا على صفحتي اشيد فيه بالعائلة وهي عائلة علمانية مثقفة متنورة تعرضت للكثير من التهديدات من قبل المتطرفين الاسلاميين. بل ان الزوجة ليست مسلمة, لتدعي جانيس انها وهابية متطرفة من اتباع الجولاني

ما يقلقنا جميعا انه وبرغم الوثائق المودعة في ادراج الامن الوطني السوري ووزاره الخارجية عن هذه الجاسوسة, الا ان جانيس ما تزال قادرة على الحصول على تاشيرات دخول الى سورية. وخلال اخر زيارة لها, استطاعت الجاسوسة الصهيونية ان تلتقي مسؤولين سوريين وتظهر على شاشة تلفزيون الاخبارية الرسمي. وما تزال الجاسوسة الصهيونية المكشوفة تحصل على اطراء وثناء من قبل سوريين مهمين ومسؤولين

ويجب الاعتراف هنا ان قضية الجاسوسة جانيس وارتباطها بالحركة الصهيونية المسيحية بشكل علني, هو الذي قادنا لاكتشاف حقيقة اكثر من خلية تجسس زرعها الموساد في سورية

فالجاسوسة جانيس ترتبط بعلاقات عمل وثيقة بمجموعة كبيرة من الجواسيس, الذي كان من المتعذر على صحافيين وسياسيين وكتاب متعاونين معنا ان نكتشفها لولا الانتماء المكشوف لجانيس لخلايا المسيحيين الصهاينة. وبعد متابعاتنا المكثفة لنشاطات جانيس وعلاقاتها مع فانيسا بيلي وايفا بارتليت وتيم انديرسون وغيرهم, اكتشفنا اسلوب العمل الموحد وارتباط المصير ومعاداة كل اصدقاء سورية والعمل على تدمير شبكات الدعم. كما ان كل هذه الخلايا تعتمد على نفس الاختراق الذي تسللوا منه الى سورية

قضية جانيس كورتكامب تلخص الموضوع الخطير الذي طرحه اكثر من ناشط ومحب لسورية. فان كانت جاسوسة معروفة مرتبطة بكنيسة صهيونية تدعم كيان الاحتلال علنا, تستطيع ان تخترق الامن الوطني السوري وتخترق مكاتب وزراء ومسؤولين, فالتساؤل يبقى عن كم عدد الخلايا التجسسية المخفية التي اخترقت الدولة مستغلة الفوضى وتفشي الارهاب وحاجة سورية الملحة لمتضامنين دوليين خصوصا غربيين؟ بل ان السؤال الاهم هنا انه وبعد تكشف حقيقة هذه الصهيونية وبالوثائق الدامغة, فكيف ما تزال قادرة على الحصول على تاشيرة لزيارة سورية؟ بل وان كان من المقبول ان تعطى تاشيرة سياحة الى سورية برغم انتماءاتها الصهيونية على اساس براغماتي ولتحقيق مصلحة مادية لقطاع السياحة السوري شبه المفلس, فكيف تستطيع ان تؤمن ظهورا في مكاتب وزراء وعلى شاشات تلفزيونات وطنية؟

خصصت هذا المقال لجانيس باعتبارها الاسهل من ضمن خلايا التجسس لانه لدينا وثائق واضحة عن انتماءاتها الصهيونية الواضحة وتكشف حقيقة اجنداتها التجسسية. وفي المقالات القادمة ساتحدث عن بعض الاعضاء الناشطين في الخلية التجسسية الموسادية وبالوثائق التي نملكها وارسلنا معظمها للمسؤولين السوريين. بعض هذه الوثائق تعتمد على العلاقات الوثيقة مع الصهيونية المعروفة جانيس كورتكامب

ومستعدون للدخول في نقاش موضوعي علمي عن هذه الوثائق والحقائق التي ذكرناها, في مواجهة الكم الهائل من الاكاذيب والشتائم التي نواجه بها كلما تحدثنا عن هذا الموضوع الحساس من قبل اعضاء الشبكات التجسسية ومؤيديهم/خلاياهم الناشطة

Why New McCarthyism Will Not Succeed in Australia: Thank God for Facebook

A journalist who in the last decade worked with me on many stories and even reached a point where he would come, unannounced, knocking on my door seeking help, is not convinced I was targeted by authorities since 2012. Despite the fact that I provided him with evidence of how authorities conspired with a foreign power against me, how they did not protect my family from local extremists and are currently involved in destroying and sabotaging my professional career, he is still not convinced.

This demonstrates a clear example of all mainstream media working according to the same script and serving the same agenda. It explains why mainstream media never showed any interest in the violent activities of local extremist supporters of the Syrian “revolution”. Despite the fact that local extremists started to fundraise and recruit terrorists from local mosques in Australia from the end of 2010, the first story about these activities did not come to light until mid-2012. I will talk about this issue in detail in another article.

In this article, I will talk about the new wave of McCarthyism that this Liberal government has managed to stir up and why it will fail. Of course we cannot expect that the current McCarthyism will be as vicious as the previous one. We do not expect that the federal government will ban the Communist party, arrest/kidnap its members, torture and kill some of them. Current McCarthyism will be more subtle and less violent. And this can be attributed (at least partially) to the telecommunication revolution and the emergence of social media.

During the previous McCarthyism, activists and revolutionists who were targeted did not have the means to challenge the brainwashing of the masses who were told they, the activists and revolutionists, were a threat to National Security and Global Order. The media was controlled by the State or by major corporations. The masses were easily convinced and coaxed to hear one side of the story. The current situation is far different.

I can claim easily that we (as a group of colleagues) were able to achieve a lot using a combination of Facebook posts, community actions and access to mainstream media. The mainstream media did not want to be left alone and marginalised in the process. This is why mainstream media resisted all our calls for them to shed light on the extremist’s violent activities in Australia, until the news could no longer be hidden from the masses due to the combination of social media and community actions.

Mainstream media, working according to the script will pick and choose what suits them, unless active members of society manage to raise certain issues as “issues of public interest”. In the previous context, the mainstream media was the one that decided what issues became “issues of public interest”. Now, many active community groups have succeeded in surging ahead of the mainstream media, forcing it to follow suit.

Facebook plays a role in all of this. It is now commonplace to watch news on the mainstream media that was first aired or trending on Facebook or YouTube. Mainstream media knows very well that it marginalises itself if it continues to stick to the script it runs and keeps up its original format.

Incidentally, I am not saying that Facebook or YouTube was created by “revolutionary” elements in society in order to break the monopoly on public opinion. On the contrary, I deeply believe that Facebook was created to serve the Empire even further, after the masses started to give up on mainstream media. But, due to the nature of social media, it is a tool they quickly lost control of.

I need also to emphasise that the process here to affect public opinion is not simple. People cannot expect that by starting a Facebook account or page they will become prominent in their society or influence the public discourse per se. The process is more complex than this. However, compared to pre-social media times, it is much easier and more efficient these days in the social media era.

These changes have been quite evident in the current political developments. Before the social media era, Australia had maintained the grip on power by its main political parties. Since Federation and until the beginning of this millennium, more than 90% of Australians voted for either one of the two main parties. Currently the two parties combined do not get more than 65% of the votes. It has become increasingly difficult to continue deceiving people to the same previous extent.

My journalist friend can deny I was targeted because of my political views. I am ready to hear his explanation on why Australian authorities needed to conspire with a foreign power against me to the point of putting my life in danger. I am also open to hear his explanation as to why the authorities did not arrest until now a single extremist, despite my repeated reporting of dozens of physical and verbal attacks on me and my kids. I am more than happy also to discuss with him why our organisation could not secure a single dollar in funding to help local communities and to help fight against radicalisation, when other well-known extreme organisations secured millions of dollars in public funding to stir hate and extremism in our society.

But what I am sure of here is that our continued campaign will prove him wrong and will expose the new McCarthyism this government has initiated in targeting its opponents.

Thank God for Facebook.